"Hal Plotkin says he himself deserves some of the blame for the dependency on cost as the key argument. In 1998, when he first started advocating for innovative uses of digital technology in higher education, "cost" was the only demonstrable argument. Only later did he observe how the development of what he originally called "public domain learning materials" was "also about improving the quality of teaching and learning through resource-sharing, collaboration and the more rapid transfer of educational best practices".

It was this realization that led him to campaign for Trustee position on the Board of Foothill-De Anza Community College District (FDHA) in 2003. During the first year of his trusteeship, he drafted and campaigned again, within FDHA, to enact the first college-wide policy offering institutional support to faculty pursuing development or adoption of OER."

You can read the rest here.

Moving college into the 21st century
By: Sec. Arne Duncan
October 1, 2009 05:04 AM EST

At many turning points in our nation's history, forward-looking presidents have made bold investments in higher education that have paid dividends for generations to come. In the midst of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Morrill Act, granting federal land to states for the establishment of colleges and universities. In the final months of World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the GI Bill, providing veterans with access to a college education and setting the stage for America to lead the world in college attendance and graduation. President Harry S. Truman supported the expansion of community colleges - now a vital set of higher education institutions that provide a bridge between high school and college and a place for adults seeking new work-force opportunities. Because of the combined foresight of these presidents, the United States has the most diverse and the best system of higher education in the world.

Today, we've reached another turning point. The global economy is changing, and the United States needs to educate its way to a better economy for the 21st century. President Barack Obama has set a goal that by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. To reach that goal, we need to bring 5 million more Americans into higher education and ensure that future generations will have the same opportunity for a college education and success in the work force.

The president has proposed a comprehensive agenda to keep a college education within reach, especially for America's poorest families, and to dramatically increase college graduation rates in the next decade. President Obama's agenda includes the largest increase in federal financial aid since the GI Bill - a 30 percent increase in fiscal 2010 alone. In addition, the president's American Graduation Initiative would provide $12 billion more during the next 10 years to improve community colleges and help students gain access to higher education and ensure that they earn their degrees.

Beyond these investments in our future, one part of the AGI has the potential to have a lasting impact on the future of higher education: The president is proposing to invest $500 million over the next 10 years to create world-class online college and high school courses that will be available to all 24/7/365. Colleges, universities, publishers, other institutions and related consortia will be invited to compete to create state-of-the-art online courses that combine high-quality subject matter expertise with the latest advances in cognitive and computer sciences. Such courses will enable students to move through the material at their own pace. When students do not understand a particular lesson or concept, carefully designed assessments will identify the gap in their learning. They'll relearn the material and have another chance to demonstrate mastery.

Such an open-source, easily accessible system of robust courses will produce the most profound equalization of access to cutting-edge knowledge and information since the creation of the public library. We will see the creation of new companies, perhaps even entirely new industries, situated squarely in the knowledge sector, which is so crucial to our national and global economic success.

Colleges and universities will be responsible for deciding whether to grant college credit if students demonstrate that they have mastered the content and skills of these courses. Some may want to offer credit in proctored testing centers as a way to accelerate student learning and accommodate more students. College professors may use an entire course, or portions of it, to enrich their classes. The Department of Defense may offer the courses to military personnel worldwide. Some motivated students will seek access to the free courses on their own, simply to discover their potential or to prepare themselves to re-enter the higher education system.

Successful completion of these courses may even encourage students to continue or complete educational paths they did not know they could master. By opening up the digital doorway to the best online higher education and high school courses available, we will provide millions of Americans with the knowledge and skills they need to advance their education and succeed in our global society. As history has taught us time and again, everyone wins when we invest in the future of higher education.

In the decades to come, the best outcome of all may well occur when the students who benefited from these free, open-learning resources become the next generation of American leaders. Millions will remember how they were helped to learn and advance toward a better life; that is something people rarely forget. It is a story they are likely to share with their children and their grandchildren - about how an American president saw a challenge and turned it into an opportunity for all.

Arne Duncan is secretary of education.

Create a New Online Skills Laboratory: Online educational software has the potential to help students learn more in less time than they would with traditional classroom instruction alone. Interactive software can tailor instruction to individual students like human tutors do, while simulations and multimedia software offer experiential learning. Online instruction can also be a powerful tool for extending learning opportunities to rural areas or working adults who need to fit their coursework around families and jobs. New open online courses will create new routes for students to gain knowledge, skills and credentials. They will be developed by teams of experts in content knowledge, pedagogy, and technology and made available for modification, adaptation and sharing. The Departments of Defense, Education, and Labor will work together to make the courses freely available through one or more community colleges and the Defense Department's distributed learning network, explore ways to award academic credit based upon achievement rather than class hours, and rigorously evaluate the results.

From President Obama's speech: "Third, even as we repair brick and mortar buildings, we have an opportunity to build a new virtual infrastructure to complement the education and training community colleges can offer. We'll support the creation of a new online - and open-source - clearinghouse of courses so that community colleges across the country can offer more classes without building more classrooms. This will make a big difference for rural campuses that often struggle to attract students and faculty. This will make it possible for a professor to complement his lecture with an online exercise, or for a student who can't be away from her family to still keep up with her coursework. We do not know where this kind of an experiment will lead; but that is exactly why we ought to try it."

See the whole talk here.

The following is the eulogy for Robert Kennedy given by his brother, Sen. Edward Kennedy at the public memorial service held on June 8, 1968, at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City.

Your Eminences, Your Excellencies, Mr. President:

On behalf of Mrs. Kennedy, her children, the parents and sisters of Robert Kennedy, I want to express what we feel to those who mourn with us today in this Cathedral and around the world.

We loved him as a brother, and as a father, and as a son. From his parents, and from his older brothers and sisters -- Joe and Kathleen and Jack -- he received an inspiration which he passed on to all of us. He gave us strength in time of trouble, wisdom in time of uncertainty, and sharing in time of happiness. He will always be by our side.

Love is not an easy feeling to put into words. Nor is loyalty, or trust, or joy. But he was all of these. He loved life completely and he lived it intensely.

A few years back, Robert Kennedy wrote some words about his own father which expresses [sic] the way we in his family felt about him. He said of what his father meant to him, and I quote: "What it really all adds up to is love -- not love as it is described with such facility in popular magazines, but the kind of love that is affection and respect, order and encouragement, and support. Our awareness of this was an incalculable source of strength, and because real love is something unselfish and involves sacrifice and giving, we could not help but profit from it." And he continued, "Beneath it all, he has tried to engender a social conscience. There were wrongs which needed attention. There were people who were poor and needed help. And we have a responsibility to them and to this country. Through no virtues and accomplishments of our own, we have been fortunate enough to be born in the United States under the most comfortable conditions. We, therefore, have a responsibility to others who are less well off."

That is what Robert Kennedy was given. What he leaves to us is what he said, what he did, and what he stood for. A speech he made to the young people of South Africa on their Day of Affirmation in 1966 sums it up the best, and I would like to read it now:

"There is discrimination in this world and slavery and slaughter and starvation. Governments repress their people; millions are trapped in poverty while the nation grows rich and wealth is lavished on armaments everywhere. These are differing evils, but they are the common works of man. They reflect the imperfection of human justice, the inadequacy of human compassion, our lack of sensibility towards the suffering of our fellows. But we can perhaps remember -- even if only for a time -- that those who live with us are our brothers; that they share with us the same short moment of life; that they seek -- as we do -- nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can.

Surely, this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely, we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men. And surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our own hearts brothers and countrymen once again. The answer is to rely on youth -- not a time of life but a state of mind, a temper of the will, a quality of imagination, a predominance of courage over timidity, of the appetite for adventure over the love of ease. The cruelties and obstacles of this swiftly changing planet will not yield to the obsolete dogmas and outworn slogans. They cannot be moved by those who cling to a present that is already dying, who prefer the illusion of security to the excitement and danger that come with even the most peaceful progress.

It is a revolutionary world we live in, and this generation at home and around the world has had thrust upon it a greater burden of responsibility than any generation that has ever lived. Some believe there is nothing one man or one woman can do against the enormous array of the world's ills. Yet many of the world's great movements, of thought and action, have flowed from the work of a single man. A young monk began the Protestant reformation; a young general extended an empire from Macedonia to the borders of the earth; a young woman reclaimed the territory of France; and it was a young Italian explorer who discovered the New World, and the 32 year-old Thomas Jefferson who [pro]claimed that "all men are created equal."

These men moved the world, and so can we all. Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation. It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.

Few are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world that yields most painfully to change. And I believe that in this generation those with the courage to enter the moral conflict will find themselves with companions in every corner of the globe.

For the fortunate among us, there is the temptation to follow the easy and familiar paths of personal ambition and financial success so grandly spread before those who enjoy the privilege of education. But that is not the road history has marked out for us. Like it or not, we live in times of danger and uncertainty. But they are also more open to the creative energy of men than any other time in history. All of us will ultimately be judged, and as the years pass we will surely judge ourselves on the effort we have contributed to building a new world society and the extent to which our ideals and goals have shaped that event.

The future does not belong to those who are content with today, apathetic toward common problems and their fellow man alike, timid and fearful in the face of new ideas and bold projects. Rather it will belong to those who can blend vision, reason and courage in a personal commitment to the ideals and great enterprises of American Society. Our future may lie beyond our vision, but it is not completely beyond our control. It is the shaping impulse of America that neither fate nor nature nor the irresistible tides of history, but the work of our own hands, matched to reason and principle, that will determine our destiny. There is pride in that, even arrogance, but there is also experience and truth. In any event, it is the only way we can live."

That is the way he lived. That is what he leaves us.

My brother need not be idealized, or enlarged in death beyond what he was in life; to be remembered simply as a good and decent man, who saw wrong and tried to right it, saw suffering and tried to heal it, saw war and tried to stop it.

Those of us who loved him and who take him to his rest today, pray that what he was to us and what he wished for others will some day come to pass for all the world.

As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him:

"Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not."

Here is an excerpt:

"Online educational software has the potential to help students learn more in less time than they would with traditional classroom instruction alone. Interactive software can tailor instruction to individual students like human tutors do, while simulations and multimedia software offer experiential learning. Online instruction can also be a powerful tool for extending learning opportunities to rural areas or working adults who need to fit their coursework around families and jobs. New open online courses will create new routes for students to gain knowledge, skills and credentials. They will be developed by teams of experts in content knowledge, pedagogy, and technology and made available for modification, adaptation and sharing."

You can review the whole proposal here.

The answer is I hang out with the right people: the people at our local community college district, Foothill-De Anza.

The truth is that has long been the key to my professional success. My pending appointment to the Obama Administration is just the latest example.

That's one reason why community college, and Foothill-De Anza in particular, is a path I recommend without hesitation to others, especially to stressed-out students, displaced workers and/or unemployed folks who may be feeling the pressure or heartbreak associated with deeply troubling personal concerns. In these difficult times many wonder, for example, how they can possibly keep their heads above water, or get ahead, or how they can they live satisfying, independent lives and be truly happy in our highly-competitive world where self-esteem is too often dictated by the thick and thin envelopes sent by collegiate admissions officers, or by where you attended college or, in other cases, more like my own experience, where financial hardship and associated difficulties made career-building attendance at college either impossible or a distant secondary consideration to what was an almost daily fight for economic survival.

Fortunately, I found my answers to those questions many years ago at our local community college district. And the remarkable thing is, three decades later, it is my service to that very same community college district, my attempt to give back, that has instead rewarded me with something I could never have ever imagined: a chance to contribute to the administration of someone I greatly admire, President Obama, in a position where there are just two people between me and the president. In other words, here is what I have discovered: if you want to participate at the highest levels of our national government, sure, it helps if you can attend Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Brown or one of the other more traditional conduits to national leadership. But what my experience demonstrates is that you can also get there right from where you are, wherever you are, via your local community college.

Here's how it happened to/for me:

Thirty three years ago, when I first entered Foothill College as a freshman I had barely graduated high school, having mostly dropped out in order to work in a variety of often depressing, low-paying jobs as a result of economic problems in our single-parent home, where we often relied on welfare and food stamps. Attending Foothill College part-time while working fulltime I encountered a phalanx of gifted and dedicated educators who illuminated a path for me from the drug store clerk I was to the professional writer, broadcaster and journalist I became. At Foothill, I met great humanitarians disguised as bookish professors, people such as Irv Roth, Herm Scheiding, Truman Cross, Bill Tinsley, and Bob Pierce, each of whom took a personal interest in my development, inspired me, prodded me and celebrated my every small success. They were my coaches and my cheerleaders, teaching me everything from punctuality to punctuation. They jumped into my life with a passion that is common in community college instructors, a passion to help students grow and turn knowledge into personal power. They had only one common request: when you make it, they would say, when you make something of your life and yourself and of this education, please live up to your responsibility to come back and give back and do what you can to make sure that what we offered you remains available to others. Armed with their support, I enjoyed many successes in my chosen profession, helping to create new public radio programming (public radio's "Marketplace"), editing a variety of publications, working for prestigious news networks, and writing hundreds of articles on assignment, including many from foreign locales.

In 2003, nearly thirty years after I graduated from Foothill, many of those same professors and other community leaders led a campaign that made me the first graduate of Foothill College to ever serve on the Foothill-De Anza Community College District Governing Board of Trustees, which oversees Foothill and De Anza Colleges, two exceptional community colleges that provide an unparalleled education to more than 45,000 students. At the time, I had an idea I wanted to pursue, a public policy idea based on my desire to involve our system of higher education more deeply in the collaborative production of free public domain learning materials. Once elected to the board, I found ready partners eager to work toward that goal, with our progress on that issue and others like it helping to more firmly distinguish our community college district as a national leader. And now, I find myself once again being lifted up by the Foothill-De Anza Community College District, this time in the person of its former Chancellor, Dr. Martha Kanter, to whom I will report, who last week was confirmed as President Obama's Under Secretary of Education, which makes her the highest ranking federal official responsible for post secondary education.

We live in difficult times. It is easy for people to become discouraged or worse. But the story I want to share at this momentous time in my life is the story of how I found my way, both as a student many years ago and more recently through service. It was a path that led me first to professional success and now, decades later, to a presidential appointment in the most significant federal administration of my lifetime. What's more, it was a path I could feel good about, one where the educational opportunities extended to me did not come at the expense of denying opportunities to anyone else.

Here in California, our community colleges are now threatened by severe budget cuts. But they remain one of the few avenues to upward mobility open to everyone without regard to who your parents were, where you came from, what you did before, or how much money you have. It's a route that if taken more often will lead to a prosperity that is more widely shared. It was, for me, the most important turn in the road.

Great things happen at community colleges. They can happen to you, too. Trust me. I know.

"Heist," the documentary film project supported by ReelChanges.org about the calamity on Wall Street, co-produced by HBO vets Donald Goldmacher and Frances Causey, pulled in $30,000 today from a single donor! That makes "Heist" the most successful project in the short history of our start-up non-profit organization, the Center for Media Change, Inc.

(CMC) develops new business models that preserve the role of a viable professional independent press in our democracy. We created CMC last year because democracy cannot survive without an adequately supported independent and free press. We also think it best if the next, post-Internet business models for the news media are more dependent on the general public for support rather than giant corporations as has been the pattern up til now, because big corporations often have a hidden or at least undisclosed agenda that influences, some might even say pollutes, the content of mass media.

What a thrill it is to see our new ReelChanges model really working! And to see members of the public coming together with professional journalists to create the high-quality investigative reporting we so desperately need, especially now. What we are talking about here is really the very lifeblood of our democracy. Congratulations to Donald and Frances, as well, for showing others how an idea presented in the right way to the right people at the right time can find the support it takes to make high quality journalism happen. Now would be a great time for reelchanges supporters to add their contributions to this valuable project, which you can do here. No amount is too small. (Btw, another ReelChanges.org project, Gen Silent by Stud Maddux, brought in totally respectable $1500 this week, also worth checking out. It casts a spotlight on the real world suffering caused by bigotry against gays).

We can create a new, more socially responsible way to finance professional high-quality news media in this country. We are a better people than our news media currently reflects. But to show the world the real America we real Americans will have to hold up the mirror ourselves. Please visit ReelChanges.org today and join us in making sure this necessary history happens.

I was saddened today to see the esteemed Mr. Guardino blast President Obama's proposal to reform the tax code that rewards U.S. companies for moving jobs overseas by eliminating the tax deduction they currently receive for those expenses. It's a somewhat complicated issue (see below). But President Obama estimates that making this change will generate $60 billion for the federal treasury over the next nine years. Guardino's oppositional response was captured by the San Jose Mercury News:

"This is a $60 billion hit on American employers that their foreign competitors won't feel," said Carl Guardino, CEO of the business-oriented Silicon Valley Leadership Group, referring to one of the president's proposals.

Here is the problem with that logic. By definition, every tax imposed on any consumer or business here in the United States is a tax that "foreign competitors won't feel." Different countries tax different things at different rates. They are not uniform. Should we set our sales tax or income tax rates based on what our trading partners charge, even though many of them are not even democracies?

The more pertinent question is: what do firms based in the United States get in exchange for their tax dollars?

For starters, they get immediate access to the world's largest market. But more importantly, and this is the key, they also get protection against the sudden confiscation of their profits and property by a stable, constitutional democracy that operates under the rule of law (unlike most of the rest of the world, see: China, Russia, Venezuela, etc.). Asking U.S. companies to pay taxes on the profits they generate in foreign markets seems a fair price to pay in return for this substantial protection, which history has time and again demonstrated has enormous value.

But President Obama's proposal does not even go that far. He is NOT asking U.S. companies to pay taxes on their foreign earnings. He merely seeks to change the tax code so that U.S. companies cannot take a tax deduction for costs related to foreign operations if they are not paying U.S. taxes on profits from those operations. As reforms go this one is relatively minor. And, ironically, it's also actually in line with the way most of our major trading partners operate. I have seen no evidence, for example, that China or Russia or any other countries grant domestic tax credits to companies that make investments in factories in the United States. (On the other hand, I don't read Chinese or Russian so I can't examine their tax codes, if anyone out there can, please let me know and confirm or refute).

That is why it so disappointing to see business leaders hyperventilate over the reforms President Obama has just proposed. Consider the circumstances:

Our economy is experiencing the worst downturn in a generation. The crisis was created, in large measure, by powerful corporations that turned our legislative bodies into obedient lapdogs when they should have been watchdogs protecting the public interest. In each case, corporate interests pursued their own very narrow goals at the expense of the rest of us. With congressional blessings financed by special interests, financial services firms pushed sub prime loans and predatory credit cards, while energy interests slowed down the development of renewable, and in particular, decentralized, forms of energy generation. In the process, our economy has literally crumbled, fallen apart, not because Americans won't work hard, but because special corporate interests looking out only for themselves got their way.

President Obama has been in office for less than six months. He deserves our support at least as much as President Bush did in the early days of his administration. President Obama is trying to restore fairness and equity to a tax code, widely viewed as unfair, that has contributed to the steady erosion of our national industrial and productive base and capacity. Making the reforms that are needed will require sacrifices from many sectors of our society, including respected local corporations that properly and legally took advantage of a tax loophole that helped them but hurt the rest of us, and harmed our national economic interests. What's more, President Obama has pledged to use at least some of the money generated by closing this loophole to strengthen the research and development tax credits made available to many of these same companies.

It would be wonderful to see the respected members of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group competing not only to see who can reward their CEO's more lavishly, but also to see who among them will emerge as the most responsible corporate leaders, willing and ready to work with the President to restore a viable productive economic base here in the United States and willing to support the changes in our tax code that make that more likely.

Or, if they like, they can move their corporate headquarters to China, Russia or Europe, and take their chances.

Woohoo!

ReelChanges.org is a project of the Center for Media Change, Inc., (CMC) the non-profit organization I created last year to experiment with new business models for journalism. We also sponsor CMC president David Cohn's www.spot.us project.

On April 19, CBS aired a "60 Minutes" segment on "cold fusion," a process that proponents claim could solve the world's energy problems. The script stated that "['60 Minutes'] asked the American Physical Society, the top physics organization in America, to recommend an independent scientist. They gave us Rob Duncan, vice chancellor of research at the University of Missouri and an expert in measuring energy." That statement is false.

None of the American Physical Society's (APS) authorized spokespersons, including the president, president-elect, executive officer, director of public affairs, head of media relations and press secretary, provided CBS with the names of any experts. APS has learned that "60 Minutes" did receive a long list of names - that included Rob Duncan's - from University of Minnesota Professor Allen Goldman, who states unequivocally that he never claimed to be acting in the name of APS.

APS does not, as an organization, endorse particular experiments or their results. That can only be done through publication in peer-reviewed journals, and by independent replication by other researchers. The APS does not endorse the cold fusion experiments featured in the April 19 "60 Minutes" news program. Any suggestion by the CBS journalists to the contrary is misleading and false.

The American Physical Society is the leading professional organization of physicists, representing over 46,000 physicists in academia and industry in the United States and internationally. APS has offices in College Park, MD (Headquarters), Ridge, NY, and Washington, D.C.

More: the link to the cold fusion segment stopped working a few hours before the entire show was pulled. On the other hand, at the moment the site still features a printed transcript of the segment here. Interestingly, the printed transcript has been edited to remove the "false statement" cited above by the APS.

What on earth is going on?

Addendum: Just as mysteriously as it vanished, the video report reappeared on the CBS 60 Minutes site a few moments ago. CBS edited the video in the same way they edited the transcript, removing the one sentence that was contested by the American Physical Society. Here is the new version...:

Watch CBS Videos Online

The dust up over cold fusion research was one of most controversial topics I ever covered. As I reported at the time, I was appalled and mystified by the vicious smears and character assassination aimed at scientists working on the experiments, attacks that should have no place whatsoever in science -- or media. There was a rush to halt federal funding and what appeared to me to be a public smear campaign against virtually anyone involved, including some very well respected scientists. It may not have been coordinated but it was certainly a gang attack. I never saw anything like it. I took risks with my own career by continuing to report on the subject long after most others stopped. More than one editor told me I was making a mistake by not dropping it and one cited it as a reason for dropping my longstanding and well-read column. But I was fascinated by the subject and persisted.

Now, twenty years later, 60 Minutes comes along with an extensively reported piece that says my earliest reports basically had it right, as did those of Wired writer Charles Platt, who was virtually the only other "mainstream" journalist to continue to follow the story after the initial interest died down.

You'd think I'd be breaking out the champagne. But instead I keep thinking about my old source, Dr. Eugene Mallove, who kept this story alive when others wanted to kill it only to himself die under mysterious circumstances. What a pity Gene did not live to see this day.

The 60 Minutes report concludes with a heart-breaking interview with Dr. Martin Flieschmann, one of the two scientists, along with Stanley Pons, whose work on cold fusion in 1989 sparked the controversy that destroyed their careers. The 60 Minutes reporter asks Flieschmann how he felt knowing that there have now been many successful subsequent peer-reviewed replications of his work, including most recently by the U.S. Department of Defense, scientists in Israel and an independent verification obtained by CBS. But Flieschmann could only muster a weak smile and sad laugh, focusing instead on the lost opportunity of the last twenty years. Indeed.

Personally, I never understood why there was such a rush to shut down the research. And I still don't. Even if the cold fusion claims don't pan out, wouldn't it be a good idea to spend more money on basic research in the field of materials sciences, including to further investigate this reported phenomena, when materials sciences are so essential to the development of a variety of alternative energy technologies?

Excerpt:

"Reelchanges.org, a showcase created to raise production money online for filmmakers' works in progress, has teamed up with Maryland Public Television (MPT) to test whether "crowdfunding" will work for public TV documentaries.

With help from a Corporation for Public Broadcasting grant, MPT has fine-tuned its pitch for donations backing its documentary Intrepid Journal: From WWII to 9-11, about the not-so-smooth sailing of a World War II aircraft carrier that recently underwent a major restoration as a naval museum docked in Manhattan.

Two additional MPT productions -- on Chesapeake Bay water quality and on the military service of African-Americans -- also will be featured on the site in a tryout backed last year with a $45,000 grant from CPB's Public Media Innovation Fund.

Working on the project with MPT are consultant Jim Russell, longtime top producer of public radio's Marketplace, and the radio program's original editor, Hal Plotkin, who founded ReelChanges.org last year."

You can read the rest here.